Technical challenges of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux after Cohen reimplantation. / Consideraciones técnicas en el tratamiento endoscópico del reflujo vesicoureteral tras reimplante tipo Cohen.

INTRODUCTION: The range of indications for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux opens more and more until including correction of secondary reflux (VUR) after ureteral reimplantation. However these cases suppose a technical challenge due to postoperative changes. The aim of this work is to present our experience on endoscopic treatment for VUR in ureteral units with Cohen reimplantation surgery, with special interest in the technical peculiarities of the procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of cases of secondary VUR after reimplantation surgery treated by subureteral injection. TECHNIQUE: We put the needle perpendicular to submucous tunnel and inject medially to hole forming a wheal on the anterior face that occludes the meatus RESULTS: During the 1993-2016 period 21 injections were performed in 15 ureteral units. The ureteral pathology included primary VUR (4), duplex system with lower pole reflux (4), megaureter (3) and ureterocele (2). Average patient age was 5.7 years old (2-12). Succesful outcome had been got in 10 ureteral units (66.67%), a decrease of VUR grade in 4 (26.67%) and perseverance/no resolution of grade IV VUR in 1 (6.67%) DISCUSSION: The anti-reflux mechanism of reimplantation depends on optimizing the submucosous tunnel. This subgroup of pacients is small and there are few studies, hindering the agreement on the most appropiate technique. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of secondary reflux after reimplantation surgery is a procedure with certain technical feature, but safe and effective offering an alternative prior to surgical reoperation.

Vesicoureteral antireflux surgery with Lich-Gregoir technique without vesical drainage: Long-term results. / Resultados a largo plazo de cirugía antirreflujo vesicoureteral con técnica de Lich-Gregoir sin drenaje vesical.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our long-term experience with patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) who underwent conventional surgery without postoperative bladder drainage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 45 patients surgically treated by extravesical Lich-Gregoir's ureterovesical reimplantation without postoperative bladder drainage between 2010 and 2013. RESULTS: 37 women (82.2%) and 8 men (17.8%). 28 patients with unilateral reflux, and 17 patients with bilateral reflux with a total of 62 operated kidneys. The mean age at surgery was 6 years (2 to 11 years). The main cause of surgical indication was the persistence of reflux in patients older than 6 years (73.3%); with grade III VUR (75.6%) being the most frequent. The mean surgical time was 44minutes (35-70) for unilateral reimplantation, and 70minutes (53-98) for bilateral ones. All patients presented spontaneous urination in the immediate postoperative period, without pain, no hematuria, full incontinence, and without a bladder balloon. None required bladder catheter placement, and hospital discharge was indicated between 7 and 36hours postoperatively (mean 11h). All continued with spontaneous micturitions, without postvoid residual or voiding dysfunction during the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The thorough selection of the patients, the detailed surgical gestures, the bladder emptying without instrumentation of the urethra, together with a correct use of analgesics and early ambulation allowed excellent outcomes obtained in these patients managed with a short hospital stay and without bladder drainage, also demonstrating the safety of the procedure at 5 years of follow-up.

[Post-hysterectomy uretero-vaginal fistula: Laparoscopic management with ureteroneocystostomy and psoas hitch.] / Fístula ureterovaginal post-histerectomía: manejo laparoscópico mediante ureteroneocistostomía y técnica de vejiga psóica.

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes our initial experience with laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in two patients with distal ureter lesions following gynaecological surgery (hysterectomy). Furthermore, we review the evidence on the incidence, prevention, and management of urinary tract injuries that occur during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. METHOD: Two patients with iatrogenic lower ureteral injuries during hysterectomy leading to ureterovaginal fistula underwent laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a psoas hitch. RESULTS: The procedures were successfully performed without any conversion. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted. Our minimally invasive approach has yielded successful results, similar to those achieved through open surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a psoas hitch for ureterovaginal fistula secondary to hysterectomy is a safe and feasible option for patients with gynecologic distal ureteral injury, with excellent results and low morbidity.

OBJETIVO: Presentamos nuestra experiencia inicial mediante ureteroneocistostomía laparoscópica en dos pacientes con lesión del uréter distal tras cirugía ginecológica (histerectomía). A su vez, se lleva a cabo una revisión de la literatura acerca de la incidencia, prevención y manejo de las lesiones urinarias secundarias a cirugía laparoscópica ginecológica.MÉTODO: Presentamos dos pacientes con fístula ureterovaginal tras lesión ureteral distal post-histerectomía, que son sometidos a ureteroneocistostomía por vía laparoscópica aplicando la técnica de vejiga psóica. RESULTADOS: Ambos procedimientos se realizaron con éxito sin necesidad de reconversión a cirugía abierta. No se objetivaron complicaciones intra ni postoperatorias. Nuestro enfoque mínimamente invasivo ofrece excelentes resultados, similares a los obtenidos en la reparación quirúrgica por vía abierta. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento de la fístula ureterovaginal secundaria a lesión ureteral distal post-histerectomía, mediante ureteroneocistostomía laparoscópica aplicando técnica de vejiga psóica, es una técnica factible y segura, con buenos resultados y bajas tasas de morbilidad asociada.

One wire tubeless ureteral reimplant: preliminary experience and step-by-step technique / One wire tubeless ureteral reimplantation: experiência preliminar e técnica passo-a-passo

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ureteral Reimplant is commonly used in pediatric and gyne-cologic surgery. Most techniques demand an experienced surgeon and lasts 2-3 hours. There is no consensus about the preferred technique until today. We report a simple modification of the Taguchi to reduce duration and make it more suitable for laparoscopic approach. METHOD: Three patients underwent distal ureteral reimplant, based on our modified Taguchi minimally invasive approach technique. Cystography and ultrasonography were performed on the 30th, 90th and 180th postoperative days to monitor kidneys; a one-year follow-up for recurrence or clinical symptoms was also performed. RESULTS: Operative time for ureteral reimplant using our technique was 15-25 minutes. The results of the performed exams on postoperative days showed normal kidneys without hydro-nephrosis. At the one-year follow-up no signs of recurrence or clinical symptoms were present. CONCLUSION: Our modifications allowed a faster and easier management of distal ureteral reimplant, with excellent perioperative and post-operative outcomes. To our knowledge this is the first detailed description of this technique through minimally invasive approach. However, further studies and a longer follow up will be necessaries to confirm the long-term outcomes and clinical benefits of our technical proposal.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O reimplante ureteral é comumente utilizado em cirurgia pediátrica e ginecológica. A maioria das técnicas exigem um cirurgião experiente e dura 2-3 horas. Não há consenso sobre a técnica preferida até hoje. Relatamos uma modificação simples do Taguchi para reduzir sua duração e torná-lo mais adequado para a abordagem laparoscópica. MÉTODO: Três pacientes foram submetidos a reimplante ureteral distal, com base na técnica de abordagem minimamente invasiva de Taguchi modificada. Cistografia e ultra-sonografia foram realizadas no 30º, 90º e 180º dias de pós-operatório para monitorização dos rins; um acompanhamento de um ano para recorrência ou sintomas clínicos também foi realizado. RESULTADOS: O tempo operatório para o reimplante ureteral utilizando a nossa técnica foi de 15-25 minutos. Os resultados dos exames realizados nos dias pós-operatórios mostraram rins normais sem hidronefrose. No seguimento de um ano não houve sinais de recorrência ou sintomas clínicos. CONCLUSÃO: Nossas modificações permitiram um manejo mais rápido e fácil do reimplante ureteral distal, com excelentes resultados peri- e pós-operatórios. Tanto quanto sabemos, esta é a primeira descrição detalhada desta técnica através de abordagem minimamente invasiva. No entanto, estudos adicionais e um acompanhamento mais longo serão necessários para confirmar os resultados a longo prazo e os benefícios clínicos da técnica proposta.

Stent vs. tutor ureteral en el trasplante renal pediátrico / Ureteral stent vs. reimplantation in pediatric kidney transplantation

Antecedentes y Objetivos: La práctica de la colocación de stent en la anastomosis ureteral en trasplante es controvertido. Los beneficios del stent incluyen: descompresión continua del uréter con menor tensión anastomótica y alineamiento ureteral que protege de la obstrucción. Las desventajas: infección urinaria, obstrucción a largo plazo de la unión ureterovesical, hematuria por erosión mucosa y el retiro del mismo bajo sedación por vía endoscópica. Es nuestro objetivo investigar la incidencia de complicaciones con la utilización de stent ureteral vs. tutor ureteral en el trasplante renal pediátrico. Material y Métodos: Valoración retrospectiva de pacientes trasplantados renales en nuestra institución con técnica de Lich-Gregoir en el implante ureteral en el período febrero 2008 a marzo 2014. Dos grupos de pacientes para investigar complicaciones: aquellos con tutor ureteral por período de 5 dias vs. los pacientes en los que se utilizó catéter doble jota (stent) por período de 30 días. Se identificaron los pacientes con uropatía y nefropatía como causa de insuficiencia renal crónica terminal (IRCT) y se asociaron a las complicaciones que fueron divididas en no infecciosas (urológicas) y en infecciosas (infección urinaria). Resultados: Se evaluaron 183 pacientes. En el grupo con tutor ureteral (n=68) se presentaron complicaciones urológicas en 8 pacientes (11.76%), 2 urópatas y 6 nefrópatas y las complicaciones infecciosas se observaron en 15 pacientes (22.06%). En el grupo stent (n=115) se presentaron complicaciones urológicas en 3 casos (2,61%), 2 urópatas y un nefrópata y las complicaciones infecciosas se observaron en 43 pacientes (37.39%). Conclusiones: La asociación de la técnica de Lich Gregoir con stent mejora la morbilidad evitando complicaciones no infecciosas, pero aumenta la incidencia de complicaciones infecciosas independiente del origen de la causa de la IRCT (AU)

Background and aims: Stent placement in ureteral anastomosis is controversial. Benefits of the stent include: continuous decompression of the ureter with less anastomotic tension and ureteral alignment with better protection from ureteral narrowing. Disadvantages: urinary infection, long-term stricture of the vesicoureteral junction, hematuria due to mucosal erosion and its endoscopic removal under sedation. Our aim was to assess the incidence of complications of the use of a ureteral stent vs. ureteral splint in pediatric kidney transplantation. Material and methods: Retrospective assessment of kidney transplant patients in whom the Lich-Gregoir technique was used for ureteral implantation between February 2008 and March 2014. Two groups of patients were selected to assess complications: Patients with a ureteral splint for 5 days vs. patients in whom a double J catheter (stent) was used for 30 days. Patients with uropathy and nephropathy due to end-stage chronic renal failure (ESRD) were identified and associated complications were divided into non-infectious (urological) and infectious (urinary infection) complications. Results: 183 patients were evaluated. In the ureteral splint group (n=68), urological complications were observed in 8 patients (11.76%), 2 uropathic and 6 nephropathic, and infectious complications were observed in 15 patients (22.06%). In the stent group (n=115), urological complications were observed in 3 cases (2.61%), 2 uropathic and 1 nephropathic, and infectious complications were seen in 43 patients (37.39%). Conclusions: The association of the Lich Gregoir technique with stent placement improves morbidity avoiding non-infectious complications, but increases the incidence of infectious complications regardless of the cause of ESRD (AU)

Manejo quirúrgico de la endometriosis vésico-ureteral y sus complicaciones / Surgical management of deep endometriosis

La endometriosis ureteral es una infrecuente localización de endometriosis profunda, que puede condicionar una grave disminución de la función renal de forma silenciosa. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con fibrosis peritoneal secundaria a endometriosis profunda, cuya inespecífica sintomatologia conllevó un retraso diagnóstico, permitiendo el desarrollo de hidronefrosis. Es necesario descartar la presencia de endometriosis profunda en mujeres en edad fértil con hidronefrosis de etiología desconocida.

Deep endometriosis rarely entails ureteral involvement. It may be responsible of asymptomatic loss of renal function. A 35-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, was managed for peritoneal fibrosis due to deep infiltrating endometriosis. The nonspecific symptoms let a delayed diagnosis and a subsequent hydronephrosis. It must be excluded the existence of deep endometriosis in women of childbearing age with hydronephrosis of unknown etiology.